j@1040
|
1 |
Ozone Loss
|
j@1040
|
2 |
==========
|
j@1040
|
3 |
|
j@1040
|
4 |
|
j@1040
|
5 |
Shown here is the chemical ozone loss in northern winter as well its
|
j@1040
|
6 |
effects on mid latitudes in Europe. For example, in winter 2010/2011
|
j@1040
|
7 |
there was a very high ozone depletion in the area of the Arctic polar
|
j@1042
|
8 |
vortex. In the frame of the `Knowledge Platform "Earth and Environment" (ESKP)`_
|
j@1040
|
9 |
the effects this ozone loss at mid latitudes are explained and
|
j@1040
|
10 |
documented on a daily basis. An early warning system for such events
|
j@1040
|
11 |
is thus established. The basis is simulations with the Jülich
|
j@1040
|
12 |
chemical transport model `CLaMS`_, which uses innovative transport and
|
j@1040
|
13 |
mixing algorithms to calculation of the exchange of air masses between
|
j@1040
|
14 |
polar and mid Latitudes (e.g. interference of low-ozone air in
|
j@1040
|
15 |
Europe). The realistic simulations are initialized by satellite
|
j@1040
|
16 |
observations and driven by ECMWF meteorological analyzes.
|
j@1040
|
17 |
|
j@1040
|
18 |
The ozone depletion in the polar vortex is determined by the
|
j@1040
|
19 |
temperature. For polar ozone loss, the temperature must drop below a
|
j@1040
|
20 |
threshold of approximately -78°C. For the Arctic winters of 2010-2020
|
j@1040
|
21 |
the `Calculations of ozone loss`_ and `Estimates from temperature`_
|
j@1040
|
22 |
are shown. To explain and assess the results, it is also explained
|
j@1040
|
23 |
how the `UV increase`_ on the ground develops in the course of spring
|
j@1040
|
24 |
for the case of different ozone losses. Calculated ozone loss and
|
j@1040
|
25 |
ozone column as well as the calculated from it maximum UV index (at
|
j@1040
|
26 |
noon with a clear sky) are considered `Map display`_ shown for the
|
j@1040
|
27 |
individual days.
|
j@1040
|
28 |
|
j@1040
|
29 |
Typically, the ozone columns in the Arctic are still higher than in
|
j@1040
|
30 |
the Antarctic despite ozone depletion, so that in the Arctic spring
|
j@1040
|
31 |
there is so far at most a moderate UV radiation at the ground.
|
j@1040
|
32 |
|
j@1040
|
33 |
Current
|
j@1040
|
34 |
--------
|
j@1040
|
35 |
|
j@1040
|
36 |
The calculations **for the current winter 2019/2020** show so far
|
j@1040
|
37 |
somewhat above average ozone depletion. Towards the end of January
|
j@1040
|
38 |
the stratospheric Temperatures are very low, i.e. high ozone depletion
|
j@1040
|
39 |
could follow if the polar vortex remains stable.
|
j@1040
|
40 |
|
j@1040
|
41 |
|
j@1040
|
42 |
Previous years
|
j@1040
|
43 |
--------------
|
j@1040
|
44 |
|
j@1040
|
45 |
Last winter 2018/2019 the stratospheric temperatures were too high for
|
j@1040
|
46 |
significant chlorine-catalyzed ozone depletion. A so-called "major
|
j@1040
|
47 |
warming" in early January led to the warming the stratosphere to split
|
j@1040
|
48 |
off a part of the polar vortex.
|
j@1040
|
49 |
|
j@1040
|
50 |
In recent years, Winter 2010/2011 and 2015/2016 were particularly
|
j@1040
|
51 |
noteworthy, as they were characterized by a cold, stable polar vortex,
|
j@1040
|
52 |
which with clear corresponding ozone depletion. This yielded only a
|
j@1040
|
53 |
slight increase in UV radiation, which is typically low in our
|
j@1040
|
54 |
latitudes in March. Extremely high UV values like in the Antarctic
|
j@1040
|
55 |
spring under the ozone hole did not occur so far in the Arctic.
|
j@1040
|
56 |
|
j@1040
|
57 |
|
j@1040
|
58 |
Winter 2015/2016:
|
j@1040
|
59 |
-----------------
|
j@1040
|
60 |
The stratospheric temperatures in winter 2015/2016 were as low as
|
j@1040
|
61 |
never seen in recent decades before with the result of a very high
|
j@1040
|
62 |
ozone loss of over 100 DU. The lower ozone columns resulted in a
|
j@1040
|
63 |
slight increase in UV radiation on the ground. However, the UV
|
j@1040
|
64 |
radiation is in these latitudes is low at this time of year. When
|
j@1040
|
65 |
these air masses of the polar vortex moved towards mid-latitudes, the
|
j@1040
|
66 |
UV index in early March is as high as normally expected in late
|
j@1040
|
67 |
March. Extremely high UV values as in the Antarctic spring under the
|
j@1040
|
68 |
ozone hole did not yet occur in the Arctic.
|
j@1040
|
69 |
|
j@1040
|
70 |
|
j@1040
|
71 |
Winter 2010/2011:
|
j@1040
|
72 |
-----------------
|
j@1040
|
73 |
The images below show the geographical distribution of the calculated
|
j@1040
|
74 |
ozone column (top) and ozone loss (bottom) for March 28, 2011. Shown
|
j@1040
|
75 |
is the total column between 12 and 22 km altitude in Dobson Units (DU).
|
j@1040
|
76 |
|
j@1040
|
77 |
.. _Calculations of ozone loss: /ozoneloss/clams/2020
|
j@1040
|
78 |
.. _Estimates from temperature: /ozoneloss/vpsc/2020
|
j@1040
|
79 |
.. _UV increase: /ozoneloss/uvi
|
j@1040
|
80 |
.. _Map display: /ozoneloss/uvmap/200119
|
j@1042
|
81 |
.. _Knowledge Platform "Earth and Environment" (ESKP): /eskp
|
j@1040
|
82 |
.. _CLaMS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLaMS
|