templates/en/rst/ozoneloss.rst
author Jens-Uwe Grooss <j.-u.grooss@fz-juelich.de>
Sat, 19 Mar 2022 20:30:22 +0100
changeset 1427 3783574e4054
parent 1410 d76278755299
child 1534 003add50a313
permissions -rw-r--r--
eskp plot update from 220319
j@1040
     1
Ozone Loss
j@1040
     2
==========
j@1040
     3
j@1040
     4
j@1040
     5
Shown here is the chemical ozone loss in northern winter as well its
j@1040
     6
effects on mid latitudes in Europe.  For example, in winter 2010/2011
j@1040
     7
there was a very high ozone depletion in the area of the Arctic polar
j@1042
     8
vortex. In the frame of the `Knowledge Platform "Earth and Environment" (ESKP)`_
j@1040
     9
the effects this ozone loss at mid latitudes are explained and
j@1040
    10
documented on a daily basis.  An early warning system for such events
j@1040
    11
is thus established.  The basis is simulations with the Jülich
j@1040
    12
chemical transport model `CLaMS`_, which uses innovative transport and
j@1040
    13
mixing algorithms to calculation of the exchange of air masses between
j@1040
    14
polar and mid Latitudes (e.g. interference of low-ozone air in
j@1040
    15
Europe). The realistic simulations are initialized by satellite
j@1040
    16
observations and driven by ECMWF meteorological analyzes.
j@1040
    17
j@1040
    18
The ozone depletion in the polar vortex is determined by the
j@1040
    19
temperature.  For polar ozone loss, the temperature must drop below a
j@1040
    20
threshold of approximately -78°C. For the Arctic winters of 2010-2020
j@1040
    21
the `Calculations of ozone loss`_ and `Estimates from temperature`_
j@1040
    22
are shown.  To explain and assess the results, it is also explained
j@1040
    23
how the `UV increase`_ on the ground develops in the course of spring
j@1040
    24
for the case of different ozone losses.  Calculated ozone loss and
j@1040
    25
ozone column as well as the calculated from it maximum UV index (at
j@1040
    26
noon with a clear sky) are considered `Map display`_ shown for the
j@1040
    27
individual days.
j@1040
    28
j@1040
    29
Typically, the ozone columns in the Arctic are still higher than in
j@1040
    30
the Antarctic despite ozone depletion, so that in the Arctic spring
j@1040
    31
there is so far at most a moderate UV radiation at the ground.
j@1040
    32
j@1040
    33
Current
j@1040
    34
--------
j@1301
    35
In contrast to the previous winter, **the current winter 2021/2022** 
j@1301
    36
so far shows rather low stratospheric temperatures. There is therefore
j@1301
    37
again the possibility of strong ozone depletion.
j@1040
    38
j@1410
    39
In contrast to the previous winter, **the current winter 2021/2022**
j@1410
    40
again shows very low stratospheric temperatures. The ozone depletion
j@1410
    41
is very significant, already above 80 DU. However, this is not quite
j@1410
    42
as much as in the largest Arctic ozone depletion so far in the year
j@1410
    43
2020.
j@1410
    44
j@1410
    45
j@1040
    46
j@1040
    47
Previous years
j@1040
    48
--------------
j@1040
    49
j@1301
    50
In recent years, the winters 2010/2011, 2015/2016, and 2019/2020 were particularly
j@1040
    51
noteworthy, as they were characterized by a cold, stable polar vortex,
j@1040
    52
which with clear corresponding ozone depletion. This yielded only a
j@1040
    53
slight increase in UV radiation, which is typically low in our
j@1040
    54
latitudes in March.  Extremely high UV values ​​like in the Antarctic
j@1040
    55
spring under the ozone hole did not occur so far in the Arctic.
j@1040
    56
j@1040
    57
j@1301
    58
j@1301
    59
Winter 2019/2020:
j@1301
    60
-----------------
j@1301
    61
The stratospheric temperatures in the winter of 2019/2020 were again
j@1301
    62
very low and the polar vortex was stable for a very long time. Both factors
j@1301
    63
led to the largest Arctic ozone loss to date. In the meantime
j@1301
    64
this is extensively documented in the scientific literature (`1`_, `2`_).
j@1301
    65
j@1301
    66
j@1040
    67
Winter 2015/2016:
j@1040
    68
-----------------
j@1040
    69
The stratospheric temperatures in winter 2015/2016 were as low as
j@1040
    70
never seen in recent decades before with the result of a very high
j@1040
    71
ozone loss of over 100 DU.  The lower ozone columns resulted in a
j@1040
    72
slight increase in UV radiation on the ground. However, the UV
j@1040
    73
radiation is in these latitudes is low at this time of year. When
j@1040
    74
these air masses of the polar vortex moved towards mid-latitudes, the
j@1040
    75
UV index in early March is as high as normally expected in late
j@1040
    76
March. Extremely high UV values ​​as in the Antarctic spring under the
j@1040
    77
ozone hole did not yet occur in the Arctic.
j@1040
    78
j@1040
    79
j@1040
    80
Winter 2010/2011:
j@1040
    81
-----------------
j@1040
    82
The images below show the geographical distribution of the calculated
j@1040
    83
ozone column (top) and ozone loss (bottom) for March 28, 2011. Shown
j@1040
    84
is the total column between 12 and 22 km altitude in Dobson Units (DU).
j@1040
    85
j@1040
    86
.. _Calculations of ozone loss: /ozoneloss/clams/2020
j@1040
    87
.. _Estimates from temperature: /ozoneloss/vpsc/2020
j@1040
    88
.. _UV increase: /ozoneloss/uvi
j@1040
    89
.. _Map display: /ozoneloss/uvmap/200119
j@1042
    90
.. _Knowledge Platform "Earth and Environment" (ESKP): /eskp
j@1040
    91
.. _CLaMS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLaMS
Impressum Datenschutzerklärung