templates/en/rst/ozoneloss.rst
author Jens-Uwe Grooss <j.-u.grooss@fz-juelich.de>
Tue, 04 Feb 2025 16:30:54 +0100
changeset 1598 c03d9beb0451
parent 1556 43fa00aefcf3
permissions -rw-r--r--
remove ESKP page links, as ESKP project ceased in 2020
j@1040
     1
Ozone Loss
j@1040
     2
==========
j@1040
     3
j@1040
     4
j@1040
     5
Shown here is the chemical ozone loss in northern winter as well its
j@1040
     6
effects on mid latitudes in Europe.  For example, in winter 2010/2011
j@1040
     7
there was a very high ozone depletion in the area of the Arctic polar
j@1598
     8
vortex. Here 
j@1040
     9
the effects this ozone loss at mid latitudes are explained and
j@1040
    10
documented on a daily basis.  An early warning system for such events
j@1040
    11
is thus established.  The basis is simulations with the Jülich
j@1040
    12
chemical transport model `CLaMS`_, which uses innovative transport and
j@1040
    13
mixing algorithms to calculation of the exchange of air masses between
j@1040
    14
polar and mid Latitudes (e.g. interference of low-ozone air in
j@1040
    15
Europe). The realistic simulations are initialized by satellite
j@1040
    16
observations and driven by ECMWF meteorological analyzes.
j@1040
    17
j@1040
    18
The ozone depletion in the polar vortex is determined by the
j@1040
    19
temperature.  For polar ozone loss, the temperature must drop below a
j@1040
    20
threshold of approximately -78°C. For the Arctic winters of 2010-2020
j@1040
    21
the `Calculations of ozone loss`_ and `Estimates from temperature`_
j@1040
    22
are shown.  To explain and assess the results, it is also explained
j@1040
    23
how the `UV increase`_ on the ground develops in the course of spring
j@1040
    24
for the case of different ozone losses.  Calculated ozone loss and
j@1040
    25
ozone column as well as the calculated from it maximum UV index (at
j@1040
    26
noon with a clear sky) are considered `Map display`_ shown for the
j@1040
    27
individual days.
j@1040
    28
j@1040
    29
Typically, the ozone columns in the Arctic are still higher than in
j@1040
    30
the Antarctic despite ozone depletion, so that in the Arctic spring
j@1040
    31
there is so far at most a moderate UV radiation at the ground.
j@1040
    32
j@1598
    33
This page was developed In the frame of the `Knowledge Platform "Earth and Environment" (ESKP)`_ . This programm ceased in 2020, but this page isstill continued. 
j@1410
    34
j@1598
    35
Current
j@1598
    36
--------
j@1598
    37
j@1598
    38
**The current winter of 2024/2025** shows specifically low
j@1598
    39
stratospheric temperatures, especially record low temperatures in
j@1598
    40
early February. A significant Arctic ozone loss is therefore possible
j@1598
    41
with later consequences on mid-latitudes.
j@1040
    42
j@1040
    43
Previous years
j@1040
    44
--------------
j@1040
    45
j@1301
    46
In recent years, the winters 2010/2011, 2015/2016, and 2019/2020 were particularly
j@1040
    47
noteworthy, as they were characterized by a cold, stable polar vortex,
j@1040
    48
which with clear corresponding ozone depletion. This yielded only a
j@1040
    49
slight increase in UV radiation, which is typically low in our
j@1040
    50
latitudes in March.  Extremely high UV values ​​like in the Antarctic
j@1040
    51
spring under the ozone hole did not occur so far in the Arctic.
j@1040
    52
j@1040
    53
j@1301
    54
j@1301
    55
Winter 2019/2020:
j@1301
    56
-----------------
j@1301
    57
The stratospheric temperatures in the winter of 2019/2020 were again
j@1301
    58
very low and the polar vortex was stable for a very long time. Both factors
j@1301
    59
led to the largest Arctic ozone loss to date. In the meantime
j@1301
    60
this is extensively documented in the scientific literature (`1`_, `2`_).
j@1301
    61
j@1301
    62
j@1040
    63
Winter 2015/2016:
j@1040
    64
-----------------
j@1040
    65
The stratospheric temperatures in winter 2015/2016 were as low as
j@1040
    66
never seen in recent decades before with the result of a very high
j@1040
    67
ozone loss of over 100 DU.  The lower ozone columns resulted in a
j@1040
    68
slight increase in UV radiation on the ground. However, the UV
j@1040
    69
radiation is in these latitudes is low at this time of year. When
j@1040
    70
these air masses of the polar vortex moved towards mid-latitudes, the
j@1040
    71
UV index in early March is as high as normally expected in late
j@1040
    72
March. Extremely high UV values ​​as in the Antarctic spring under the
j@1040
    73
ozone hole did not yet occur in the Arctic.
j@1040
    74
j@1040
    75
j@1040
    76
Winter 2010/2011:
j@1040
    77
-----------------
j@1040
    78
The images below show the geographical distribution of the calculated
j@1040
    79
ozone column (top) and ozone loss (bottom) for March 28, 2011. Shown
j@1040
    80
is the total column between 12 and 22 km altitude in Dobson Units (DU).
j@1040
    81
j@1598
    82
.. _Calculations of ozone loss: /ozoneloss/clams/2025
j@1598
    83
.. _Estimates from temperature: /ozoneloss/vpsc/2025
j@1040
    84
.. _UV increase: /ozoneloss/uvi
j@1598
    85
.. _Map display: /ozoneloss/uvmap/250203 
j@1042
    86
.. _Knowledge Platform "Earth and Environment" (ESKP): /eskp
j@1040
    87
.. _CLaMS: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLaMS
j@1598
    88
.. _1: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033339
j@1598
    89
.. _2: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/toc/10.1002/(ISSN)1944-8007.ARCTICSPV
Impressum Datenschutzerklärung